They were all removed in #2815, but it looks like this one got added
from a Google export which missed the update. See #2815 for reasons why
removing this is desirable.
Add `Conditional` wrapper to gtest
This follows an initial proposal for an 'EqIff` matcher. `Conditional` was considered more precise as an EqIff() matcher may suffer from `Iff` not being universally understood.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 383407665
Implement 'Contains(e).Times(n)' matcher modifier which allows to test for arbitrary occurrences including absence with Times(0).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 382210276
Update stale links to `gmock_cook_book.md`.
I'm a new googletest user and found these links broken when reading the documentation.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 357786392
Change Matcher<T> to allow binding an implementation by value directly:
- Drop the requirement of MatcherInterface. Doing manual type erasure avoid
extra layers in many cases.
- Avoid the adaptor for `MatcherInterface<T>` and `MatcherInterface<const T&>` mismatch.
- Use a small object optimization when possible. This makes things like
`_` and `Eq(1)` really cheap and do not require memory allocations.
- Migrate some matchers to the new model to speed them up and to test the new framework. More matchers to come in future changes.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 350580998
Add a `Pointer` matcher as an analog to `Pointee`.
Similar to `Pointee`, `Pointer` works with either raw or smart pointers and
allows creating a matcher like Pointer(Eq(foo)) for smart pointers.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 346164768
GMock: Make Truly explain when it fails
I just wrote a test that had a matcher of the form
Optional(AllOf(
SomeMatcher,
SomeOtherMatcher,
Truly(SomePredicate)))
The predicate failed, the other two matchers succeeded, and I got a hard-to-interpret message saying that the value in the optional "didn't match". Didn't match what?
This change improves situations like that slightly by having Truly explain to its result listener when it fails. When there are multiple Trulys in an AllOf, there will be some ambiguity, but it will at least provide more information than right now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 341105141
Remove obsolete comment about non-const references.
They used to be banned by the C++ style guide, but positions shifted, and this comment is no longer up to date.
There's another reference (heh) on lines 816-819 to how gmock is a "general framework", with the possible implication that support for non-const references was weird in some way and only there to be "general", but I left it alone because I don't really feel I understand what it's saying.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 339323428
