GMock: Make Truly explain when it fails
I just wrote a test that had a matcher of the form
Optional(AllOf(
SomeMatcher,
SomeOtherMatcher,
Truly(SomePredicate)))
The predicate failed, the other two matchers succeeded, and I got a hard-to-interpret message saying that the value in the optional "didn't match". Didn't match what?
This change improves situations like that slightly by having Truly explain to its result listener when it fails. When there are multiple Trulys in an AllOf, there will be some ambiguity, but it will at least provide more information than right now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 341105141
On a diskless system you cannot get the current directory. So if
death tests are disabled anyway, there is no point trying to
get current directory.
Without this fix, running tests on diskless systems will fail,
even when death tests are disabled.
Remove obsolete comment about non-const references.
They used to be banned by the C++ style guide, but positions shifted, and this comment is no longer up to date.
There's another reference (heh) on lines 816-819 to how gmock is a "general framework", with the possible implication that support for non-const references was weird in some way and only there to be "general", but I left it alone because I don't really feel I understand what it's saying.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 339323428
Fix some issues when running fuse_gmock_files.
The module path should be updated before importing `fuse_gtest_files`, since
the script may not run from the googletest repo root. We also need a non-frozen
set in order to track progress.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 337380466
Suggest using generic lambdas for composing macros.
Long chains of macros hurt legibility; generic lambdas are an easy way to abbreviate them, but are not an obvious solution to casual users.
Compare:
EXPECT_THAT(f(), ElementsAre(
Property(&MyClass::foo, Property(&OtherClass::bar, Contains("x"))),
Property(&MyClass::foo, Property(&OtherClass::bar, Contains("y"))));
to:
EXPECT_THAT(f(), ElementsAre(HasFooBar("x"), HasFooBar("y")));
PiperOrigin-RevId: 336870137
Improve lookup of operator<< for user types
Without this fix, trying to use this class with googletest
struct Foo {};
template <typename OutputStream>
OutputStream& operator<<(OutputStream& os, const Foo&) {
os << "TemplatedStreamableInFoo";
return os;
}
results in an ambiguity error between the class' operator<< and the
operator<< in gtest-printers.h removed in this CL.
This fix also enables implicit conversions to happen, so that e.g.
we will find the base class operator<< if a subclass has no
operator<< of its own.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 336261221
Please note that changing the default value for a type can make [you]* test.....
Here "you" word doesn't make sense.. rather "your" seems to make it understandable.
Revision of recent DoubleNearPredFormat change to support more toolchains.
isnan() is a macro in C99, and std::isnan() is a function in C++11. The previous change used `isnan` directly, and broke some tests in open source.
This CL changes it to follow the practice in gmock-matchers.h, and spell uses of isnan as
(std::isnan)(f)
. The parens around `std::isnan` prevent it from being recognized as a macro in the preprocessor.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 333374377
Improve DoubleNearPredFormat output on bad epsilons
DoubleNearPredFormat will happily accept epsilon values (abs_error) that
are so small that they are meaningless. This turns EXPECT_NEAR into a
complicated and non-obvious version of EXPECT_EQ.
This change modifies DoubleNearPredFormat) so that when there is a
failure it calculates the smallest meaningful epsilon value, given the
input values, and then prints a message which explains what happened.
If a true equality test is wanted either pass a literal 0.0 as abs_error
or use EXPECT_EQ. If a check for being almost equal is wanted consider
using EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ which, contrary to its name, verifies that the
two numbers are *almost* equal (within four ULPs).
With this change the flaky test mentioned in crbug.com/786046 gives this
output:
The difference between 4.2934311416234112e+18 and 4.2934311416234107e+18 is 512, where
4.2934311416234112e+18 evaluates to 4.2934311416234112e+18,
4.2934311416234107e+18 evaluates to 4.2934311416234107e+18.
The abs_error parameter 1.0 evaluates to 1 which is smaller than the minimum distance between doubles for numbers of this magnitude which is 512, thus making this EXPECT_NEAR check equivalent to EXPECT_EQUAL. Consider using EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ instead.
Tested:
I confirmed that this change detects the bad epsilon value that caused
crbug.com/786046 in Chromium and added a test for the desired output.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 332946880
