From 8b521aa43aa570fb9a106099f12427ccff2a79cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Abseil Team Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:50:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gmock_cook_book.md: Delete superfluous statement from 2014. PiperOrigin-RevId: 454677195 Change-Id: I7a1419e22d617db41a5c310bc6f6158ba4cec1ab --- docs/gmock_cook_book.md | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/gmock_cook_book.md b/docs/gmock_cook_book.md index b6abffae..8a11d864 100644 --- a/docs/gmock_cook_book.md +++ b/docs/gmock_cook_book.md @@ -392,8 +392,7 @@ Old macros and their new equivalents: If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, we say that it's an "uninteresting call", and the default action (which can be specified using `ON_CALL()`) of the method will be taken. Currently, an uninteresting call will -also by default cause gMock to print a warning. (In the future, we might remove -this warning by default.) +also by default cause gMock to print a warning. However, sometimes you may want to ignore these uninteresting calls, and sometimes you may want to treat them as errors. gMock lets you make the decision